Ethics

AI ethics navigates responsible development, bias mitigation, transparency, and societal impact for technology advancements.

Summary: The article reflects on predictions made last year and introduces new trends for 2024 in the field of artificial intelligence. Key trends include the rise of customized chatbots, the second wave of generative AI in video creation, the prevalence of AI-generated election disinformation, and the development of monolithic models for multitasking robots. It also highlights challenges such as biases and reliability issues in AI models. The focus is on specific areas where AI is expected to make significant strides in the coming year.

Summary: The article discusses the ethical implications of Artificial Intelligence and the responsible use of AI/ML in healthcare. AWS’s Responsible AI Lead, Diya Wynn, emphasizes the potential of AI in addressing challenges but stresses the importance of responsible implementation. A survey by AWS and Morning Consult reveals a growing awareness of responsible AI among business leaders, but a notable age gap in familiarity. Wynn discusses AWS’s initiatives, including Guardrails for Amazon Bedrock and AI Service Cards, to address challenges like toxicity and bias, promoting transparency and responsible AI development.

Summary: The article discusses one of the first empirical investigations into AI ethics within private technology companies, highlighting a significant gap between policy and practice. Despite industry growth in AI ethics, companies often fail to prioritize accountability mechanisms and ethical safeguards in AI development. The study reveals obstacles faced by AI ethics workers, including the challenge of foregrounding ethics in a product-centric environment and the difficulty of quantifying ethical considerations. The research emphasizes the importance of regulation in incentivizing companies to prioritize AI ethics initiatives.

Summary: The U.S. Department of Defense established ethical principles for AI use in warfare in 2020. Drawing parallels between the military and healthcare, where quick decision-making is crucial, the article discusses the potential impact of generative AI on healthcare. Despite concerns about transparency and bias, ethical principles for generative AI in healthcare are understudied. The article proposes the “GREAT PLEA” ethical principles—Governability, Reliability, Equity, Accountability, Traceability, Privacy, Lawfulness, Empathy, and Autonomy—and introduces a framework to address ethical concerns in healthcare, drawing insights from the military experience.

Summary: The study investigates the potential propagation of harmful, race-based medical content by four commercially available large language models (LLMs) in healthcare scenarios. The LLMs, including ChatGPT and GPT-4, displayed instances of perpetuating race-based medicine and inconsistencies in responses. Questions about kidney function and lung capacity revealed problematic race-based answers. The study emphasizes the risk of LLMs amplifying biases and causing harm in healthcare, urging caution in their use for medical decision-making. The need for further evaluation, transparency, and addressing potential biases before clinical integration is emphasized.